Arkansas Supreme Court Opinion: Motion Denied
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
Opinions delivered October 29, 2009
CR08-1493. Damien Wayne Echols v. State of Arkansas, from Craighead
Circuit, Western District. Appellant’s motion for order staying appeal
and remanding for further proceedings regarding showing of actual
innocence is denied. Wills, J., not participating.
Comments
I live in Australia and I follow your sites daily, quite often in complete disbelief that the things I am reading are happening in America in 2009!? I spread the word to anyone willing to listen and have shown the movies to all my friends hoping that even from way down here, we can try and make a difference. I wear my free the WM3 bracelet as a reminder that if I think I am having a bad day, I can think again and if I feel like I have no options; I am so wrong. Thinking of the boys puts so much in perspective. My time takes on a whole new meaning.
I read that the motion was denied and thought I would be sick. Then I read the comment about the federal Judge. My question is time frame?? How long does that take and what will happen now?
Do you know, or have any idea, when they will present to the Federal Judge?
Thank YOU, Polly!
Im from England UK and I follow daily. Really hope justice can be done.
FREE THE WEST MEMPHIS 3.
Hey Justice: Thanks for the website. Will go there as soon as I finish this note to you. You seem pretty knowledgable about all this. I am very curious about the piece of Terry Hobb's hair that was found at the crime scene in one of the boys shoelaces. Was that hair found on his stepson, or was it another child? I would suppose it could be more easily explained away if it was on his stepson. Also, I haven't yet stumbled upon much specific information regarding the crime scene except that there was no evidence found there. It just seems that the crime took place at another location (which would have been littered with evidence) then these boys were moved to the creek. Is that the general consenses? Thanks! Terri